1. The Brothers Karamozov - Fyodor Dostoevsky (Russia)
2. Don Quixote - Miguel Cervantes (Spain)
3. Wild card! Edit: The Beautiful Mrs. Seidenman - Andrzej Szczypiorski (Poland)
Say what you will about my consistency -- or lack thereof -- in this challenge, it keeps me coming back for more. I like its simplicity. Maybe this is the year I keep my focus all the way through.
I'm staying realistic and choosing Pike's Peak (12 books) for 2026. If I can do more, I can always upgrade later and if I manage that, yay for me!
Bev at My Reader's Block keeps this challenge streamlined and maybe I won't be posting all my reviews in December this year, either. Hey, a girl needs goals, right?
If you want to join and chase some of those peaks while clearing space on the TBR pile, sign up here anytime during 2026. Happy climbing!
Pike's Peak:
I'm in for another year! Reading by color is one of my favorite ways to choose books. I'm not sure why I like it so much, but it definitely makes me pull books I might otherwise not get around to and put them front and center.
Bev at My Reader's Block runs this challenge smoothly and efficiently, and she's very tolerant of folks like me who produce reviews in a tidal wave at the last minute.
Sign up here -- you can join anytime during 2026.
Here are my books for this year:
Blue: North Sun or The Voyage of the Whaleship Esther - Ethan Rutherford (review)
Red: Milk Blood Heat - Dantiel W. Moniz (Florida Book Award) (review)
Yellow: Crimes in a Second Language - Elizabeth Sims (Florida Book Award)
Green: Trust - Hernan Diaz (Pulitzer Prize) (review)
Brown: Without a Paddle: Racing Twelve Hundred Miles Around Florida by Sea Kayak - Warren Richey Substitute: Flesh - David Szaley (Booker Prize)
Black: Cigar City: Tales from a 1980s Creative Ghetto - Paul Wilborn (Florida Book Award) (review)
White: Reading the River: A Voyage Down the Yukon - John Hildebrand Substitute: A Room of One's Own - Virginia Woolf
Another color (gray): Matters of Faith - Kristy Kiernan (Florida Book Award) (review)
Implies Color (rainbow): The Antidote - Karen Russell (review)
Maybe I shouldn't have picked two hefty books, but I did . . . and didn't crack even one of them.
Better luck next year, says I. Sign-up post coming soon.
This challenge is a good motivator and I started strong (as usual) and then faded (also pretty much as usual). Oh, well.
In 2026 I will drop back to the doable goal of Pike's Peak (12 books). It's shaping up to be a busy year for me, so a more moderate goal seems like a wise choice.
Here's what I read in 2025 from the TBR pile, though:
Reviews can be accessed here or under the Reviews tab.
This was a mixed bag of cozy mystery, classics, award-winning fiction, random nonfiction, biography, and memoir. That's one of the charms of this challenge: because my reading taste is eclectic, so are the books!
Here's what I read:
But first, stay tuned for the report of my miserable fails on my other 2025 challenges.
I don't usually read biographies and am not qualified to judge whether Ron Chernow's Alexander Hamilton is a good one, but the reviewers and critics say it's excellent, including The New York Times Book Review and Kirkus Reviews. It covers Hamilton's rise and fall in great detail, befitting a man who is perhaps our most interesting Founding Father. The arc of his life is truly extraordinary.
Knowing most of what I know about Hamilton from Miranda's musical, I found the details rather dry. I most enjoyed the excerpts from Hamilton's own writings and letters, and various perspectives offered by his contemporaries; they were by far the most interesting part. This reflects my own view more than Chernow's skill: biography isn't my cup of tea or -- since we're in America -- coffee.
Clearly, Chernow's research was extensive and that must have been great fun for him; it's a secret fantasy of mine to be a well-known researcher and arrange access to certain original works of art or history. To hold the actual texts in your hands must be an extraordinary feeling!
Chernow sought out the specifics and included them in this large volume. Miranda made those details come alive and sing -- literally. I'm not sure any source material could compete with that.
Excerpt:
Hamilton was frank about his financial travails. George Washington Parke Custis, the president's adopted grandson, told how Hamilton appeared at the presidential mansion after tendering his resignation. Washington's staff was there when Hamilton smilingly entered. "Congratulate me, my good friends," he announced, "for I am no longer a public man. The president has at length consented to accept my resignation and I am once more a private citizen." Hamilton, noting their dismay, explained, "I am not worth exceeding five hundred dollars in the world. My slender fortune and the best years of my life have been devoted to the service of my adopted country. A rising family hath its claims." Hamilton then picked up a slim volume on the table and turned it over in his hands. "Ah, this is the constitution," he said. "Now, mark my words. So long as we are a young and virtuous people, this instrument will bind us together in mutual interests, mutual welfare, and mutual happiness. But when we become old and corrupt, it will bind us no longer." This queasy view of America's future guaranteed that Hamilton wouldn't just bask in the afterglow of his Treasury success and would return to politics.
Note: This book counts towards the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
At its simplest, this is a story of fathers and sons. Famous writer Vishwanath begins writing again, spurred by the death of his son in an accident. His new novel focuses on the wealthy head of a family business, known as Lala Motichand ("lala" being a term of respect) and his three sons. One son is suited for the family business, one son prefers poetry, and the third son is a schoolteacher who is kept on the edge of the family because of his illegitimacy. Vishwanath decides to tell the story of Lala Motichand's personal servant and his son, as well.
It's particularly interesting that in this male-oriented world, women play significant roles while remaining under the domination of the patriarchy. A young woman seeks education, a servant maneuvers her way into unquestioned authority, a widow succeeds at petty household politics. These secondary stories add complexity, while illustrating that these dramas take place in the background of the men's stories.
The similarities and differences between the fathers and sons make up the main tension in the novel within a novel, bringing up themes of family, childhood, loyalty, and personal fulfillment, all set within Indian culture. It's a dizzying, dazzling assembly, dense with correspondences and possibilities.
Excerpt:
And while the entire household and the ashram, including Kamala, busied themselves in preparing for his wedding, the hero of the drama they were staging, the centrepiece of this magnificent tableau, the groom Diwanchand, sat around his rooms listlessly, turning one book over then another but unable to attend to any of the various readings he had set himself because whenever he did manage to get to his desk either his sister-in-law would send a tailor to him to fit him out for yet another suit of clothes or his brother or his father would send for him because he was needed to come along to an associate's house where an invitation was to be delivered. Although he did each of these things without protest . . . he found himself drifting further and further away, feeling more and more like a counter that was being moved around a board to which it didn't belong, by players who didn't care.
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
Any one of these topics would be fascinating and having them all together, liberally sprinkled with stories about famous musicians and dancers, is a feast for the reader. What does Tharp require from her assistants? (Practically everything; she herself says she is demanding.) How does she get to know her dancers during the early rehearsals? (Have them bring in some of their favorite Latin dance music.) What's her "secret weapon" in collaborations, including with Elvis Costello and Jerome Robbins? (Being able to make them laugh.)
All this in Tharp's distinctive voice. She translates very well to the page; her writing style mirrors her speaking style and although the subject matter is often serious -- we're talking about major art being made here -- her words are precise, generous, and chatty. Her wisdom applies in any arena, not just on the stage. It's like being at her elbow, learning from the master, so you can apply it yourself to whatever you want to be good at.
Excerpt:
Movement was a great communication zone for us. I spoke no Russian. [Baryshnikov's] English was minimal. We mostly communicated through movement. If I needed to talk to explain a point, his language circuits would shut down and he'd go . . . inside. We needed a translator but there was none.
A language barrier? Not really. We had a common language -- we were dancers with similar work habits. We were both used to technique class in the morning and then rehearsal following that. Daily. Annually. That is ultimately what allowed us to work together.
See more about their collaboration (including some of the dancing) here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utk6lA-caqM
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
I also don't mind knowing the ending before I reach it -- unless maybe it's a surprise ending with a big twist at the finish. Then, well, maybe. Many a time I've tried to explain that that the classic fade of "You'll have to read it yourself to find out what happens . . . " means nothing to me. Tell me everything, up front, so I know where I am!
Anyway, I'm late to the party on David Copperfield and was happy to catch up. Dickens is a pleasure, despite the Victorian flourishes and his tendency to use many words when only a few will do. He's also occasionally a little sweet for my taste. (Gasp! Have I become a modernist?) However, a classic is a classic and I added it to my Done Read list in 2024.
Kingsolver's adaptation of the plot points and characters from Dickens is exceptionally well-done. I learned a lot about the dire circumstances of Appalachian life, including abusive homes, foster homes, oxycontin addiction, meth labs, extreme poverty, exploitation, and complicated family circumstances. It's Victorian London all over again, teeming with troubles and amazing characters trying to make ends meet with varying degrees of success. Most of the Dickens sweetness has been sanded off by the grit of modern life.
Demon Copperhead, nicknamed for his fiery red hair, endures all of the trials the world can throw at him, and somehow still manages to maintain a measure of goodness, character, and grace. Like David Copperfield, he is the hero you want to root for, full of sass and vulnerability, sometimes lost, sometimes on track, always following his moral compass but zigzagging along the way.
Excerpt:
She saw me. Raised up her hand trowel like she was fixing to throw it. "Go away!"
I was frozen.
"I said get. No boys here!" She started chopping the air with her weapon.
If I opened the gate and took a step towards her, which I did, there was nothing brave about it. Just no choice. "I'm sorry," I said. "I'm your grandson."
She lowered the trowel. She had those wraparound sunglasses that old people wear, and she took them off. Underneath was another pair of thick glasses that made her eyes look like swimming fish. Green like mine, milky, surprised. She stood there looking me over from my busted shoe to the top of my wiry red head. Especially that.
"Oh, lord," she said. And sat down on the ground.
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
We meet Ellen Baxter as the quintessential "trophy wife," gorgeous enough to be briefly mistaken for Princess Diana when arriving at the Paris Ritz. Ellen has her moment in the intrusive glare of the photographers' flashes, but is released from their scrutiny as soon as the mistake becomes apparent. She's in town with her brilliant, stodgy husband while he attends a conference.
The next morning brings a flood of breaking news of Diana's death. (I remember very well awakening to the news myself -- August 1997 -- and being unexpectedly tearful in front of the television. Diana had her faults, as we all do, but managed to be a beacon of kindness and heart in the midst of all she endured. Her legacy lives on.)
Ellen anticipates shopping, a tour of Notre Dame, and a nice lunch somewhere. Instead, she goes to the crash site, finds an unconventional photograph of Diana, and meets the photographer who apparently left it there. On impulse, she takes the photograph with her; from then on, she hears Diana's voice in her head and experiences some of Diana's emotions and physical feelings in her own body. This confluence becomes a powerful tool for Ellen to gain insight into Diana's life and, significantly, into her own.
This is a wonderful novel. Once we accept the premise that the italics in the text represent Diana's voice and make peace with the idea of treating a real person as a character in a novel, Ellen's journey of re-self-discovery grips our attention. Ellen's grown accustomed to being an afterthought, a mere accessory to her successful husband, hardly anything more. If we have a shred of that feeling of erasure in our own experience, we will relate. With Diana as a guide and commentator and Ellen as a companion, we seek our own re-self-discovery. And isn't that what literature is for?
Excerpt:
And the next morning, I'm back in our room from the site of her fatal crash, lying in bed watching TV and thinking about calling my mother, and I'm still wishing I'd thanked Diana for that.
I think, -- Maybe that -- all of it, some of it -- would have meant something to her. Maybe if I'd told her she gave a lot of women who felt like failures the courage to hold their heads up high, she would have taken it with her to her grave a few hours later.
And she says, Thank you, Ellen.
I sit up. It hasn't occurred to me that she could hear my thoughts.
I think, -- You're welcome.
That's not how it felt, though, she says.
Then she's quiet.
I think to myself, -- Wow.
And then to her, -- What did it feel like?
It would seem that I have nothing in common with the title character of Chaim Potok's novel, My Name is Asher Lev -- and yet I find myself powerfully moved by his story.
Asher Lev is a Jewish child whose family follows a a strict set of religious principles and requirements while he is growing up in Brooklyn. He is also an artist who draws and paints at every opportunity, even when it gets him into trouble. His drive to express himself coalesces into the title phrase, a way of asserting his identity, even his existence as a unique, creative, independent person. These two selves -- the observant Jew and the budding artist -- are often at odds, leading Asher Lev to feel even more individualized, more alienated, from his parents and community.
Asher's determination to honor his artistic impulse creates a rift in his family; they cannot understand, for example, that his desire to view paintings of nudes and crucifixions is part of his artistic education. The conflict between religion and art drives much of the action in the novel. While Asher attempts to find a way for the two to coexist, it's apparent that as he matures as an artist, he will ultimately have to choose between them. The fact that he is very talented makes this choice even more difficult.
Throughout the novel, Asher's desire for realizing his destiny spoke to me. Perhaps this is because everyone -- artistic or otherwise -- must discover and assert their identity to the world, and then stand fast against the disapproval and occasionally the hostility of those challenged by the simple act of asserting that identity.
The common experience of choosing who you are lies at the heart of this novel and imbues it with a broader meaning, one that transcends the details of Asher's life and speaks to every reader.
Excerpt:
I saw a picture in the Times the following day of Stalin lying in his coffin. Behind the coffin were mounds of flowers. I could not take my eyes off the picture. This was the man who had killed tens of millions of people. Now he lay in his mustache and uniform in front of a mountain of flowers, dead, as dead as the millions he had slain, as dead as Yudel Krinsky's wife and children. I could not stop staring at the picture of Stalin dead in his coffin.
I went over to Yudel Krinsky's store that Monday and helped him wait on some customers. We were alone for a few minutes between customers and he said to me, glancing around quickly, "The others who follow him will be just like him. There are many Stalins in Russia."
I helped him stack packages of paper. I was beginning to understand the differences between grades of paper. Often now I could tell the weight and quality of a piece of paper by holding it in my hands.
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
Another intriguing aspect of this novel is its geographical connection to the area we now call Paynes Prairie, a wilderness preserve near Gainesville, Florida, where bison and wild horses still roam.
Through the eyes of Old One, a hunter whose prime is past, we learn the history of these people. Only the children still look to him for guidance, but it's clear that he has both knowledge and wisdom that surpass the current leaders, and especially the current leader, The Strong One, who seems to revere power and the exercise of force above all else. Old One feels he is becoming a burden to the tribe, because an injury has left him unable to hunt with the others. But he stays on the periphery to teach the children, contribute small game when he can, and keep watch on an ominous situation: The Strong One has his eye on one of Old One's students, a girl who is not receptive to The Strong One's intentions. Old One hopes to protect her but he's not sure how to accomplish that.
The appearance of the Beast -- or rather, the calls and tracks of the Beast -- brings a crisis of a different kind to the village, accompanied by the appearance of a competing band of early humans called The Strangers. Only the Old One's memory and cunning give the village a chance of success.
I have long resisted pre-historic novels, but this tale won me over. I felt I was learning a tremendous amount about pre-historic life in Florida. If it was difficult for me to fully "suspend my disbelief" and sink fully into the story, that's on me. It's engrossing, fast-paced, intriguing, and mysterious. Old One's tale of late-life usefulness and understanding keeps us reading, reflects his time, and touches us all.
Excerpt:
[Old One] sniffed to scrutinize the smell. His heart thumped in his chest as if he were actually seeing the animal charge rather than only anticipating its presence. The odor was unmistakable. It was not the familiar smell of deer or the rarer peppery smell of cat. It hurled him back in time to the small child at the core of what he had become. Struggling to stand, he took the risk of exposure.
He stepped to the side and leaned out to check the blind spot of the tree's crown. It, too, was empty. But the smell set afire his awareness. And there was the disturbed ground, the uprooted scallions, a moist lump of excrement. It was alive. It was somewhere near. The Beast had returned.
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
Bennie Salazar, a record company executive, and his assistant, Sasha, provide the throughline for the novel, which shifts its focus to various characters (all tangentially related through work or life to Bennie or Sasha or both) and moves back and forth through time. This shifting gives the novel an elusive quality, mimicking the was memories can bend and twist until we aren't quite sure of the sequence of events or who was present at the time.
This is no walk down memory lane. The punk scene impacts the complicated lives of the characters, some of whom struggle with mental illness and criminal behavior, all of whom wind up compromised in one way or another. It's gritty. It's sometimes intense. The wide range of characters and their quick entry and exit creates a kaleidoscope effect that I occasionally found difficult to follow.
This map helped (click to enlarge, so you can read the connections that the arrows represent -- tessiegirl did a great job on this!):
Ultimately, though, the novel is about the passage of time and how that affects all the characters -- and by extension, the reader. The music industry, with its emphasis on youth and novelty, accelerates what we all confront, sooner or later: our own mortality and the truth of what we have done with our lives.
We may be busy with our daily lives, but brute-like time stalks all of us. There's no escaping the visit, when it finally arrives.
Excerpt:
[Stephanie] was thinking of the old days, as she and Bennie now called them -- not jut pre-Crandale but premarriage, preparenthood, premoney, pre-hard drug renunciation, preresponsibility of any kind, when they were still kicking around the Lower East Side with Bosco, going to bed after sunrise, turning up at stangers' apartments, having sex in quasi public . . . because none of it was serious. They were young and lucky and strong -- what did they have to worry about? If they didn't like the result, they could go back and start again. And now Bosco was sick, hardly able to move, feverishly planning his death. Was this outcome a freak aberration from natural laws, or was it normal -- a thing they should have seen coming? Had they somehow brought it on?
Jules put his arm around her. . . .
"Sure, everything is ending," Jules said, "but not yet."
Note: This book counts toward the Color Coded Reading Challenge and the Mount TBR Reading Challenge.
From there it's a short leap to: What was Penelope's story while Odysseus was taking his roundabout 10-year journey home from the Trojan war (The Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood)? What was Circe's life like before and after Odysseus's visit (Circe by Madeline Miller)? What did Jim, the enslaved runaway from Huckleberry Finn, think about their adventures (James by Percival Everett)? There are a number of other novels that use this method (a "best of" list here, if you're interested); I'm not sure if it requires less creativity or more creativity to write using this format.
I thought this kind of storytelling was a recent idea, and Jean Rhys' novel, Wide Sargasso Sea, published in 1966, may be the first of this sort. I would love to know if that's true. Stoppard's play was first performed that same year -- so perhaps there was something in the air in 1966. How fun it would be if they knew each other! Maybe Rhys (real name: Ella Gwendoline Rees Williams) and Stoppard attended a workshop together or met at a party. That would be a wonderful "gap filling" tale (true or imagined!).
Rhys' novel provides the backstory of the "mad" first Mrs. Rochester from Jane Eyre. It's a prequel, really (another recent form), and explores themes of racism, slavery, colonialism, and sexism through the life events of Antoinette Cosway. Antoinette grows up in Jamaica in a way that feels between worlds: her family benefitted from colonialism and slavery and was thrown into financial distress when slavery was abolished in 1833. Antoinette's widowed mother is Creole, not white, and though she retains some of her aristocratic ways, it's financially impossible to maintain the trappings of wealth. It becomes increasingly uncomfortable and even dangerous for them to live among the freed and understandably resentful native-born Jamaicans. The feeling of gathering menace is palpable in this section, narrated by Antoinette as a child. Tragic events loosen the mother's grip on sanity and Antoinette is left alone in the world, essentially among strangers.
When Antoinette is older, her marriage to Rochester is arranged, but the difference in economic status and her family background of mental illness, combined with his obvious lack of character, give him leverage to abuse her mentally and emotionally. This section is alternately narrated by Antoinette and Rochester, so we have a window into his cruel psyche. He renames Antoinette "Bertha" and flaunts his unfaithfulness to her. Although Antoinette is initially desperate to regain his trust and love, her efforts backfire. Ultimately Rochester takes her to England, away from the tropical countryside she loves and the only home she's ever known.
Once in England, Antoinette's circumstances grow even worse. She tells how Rochester confines her to the attic, essentially imprisoning her in the upper floor of his mansion. She has a paid companion, more jailer than friend, and her isolation causes her to become more and more detached from reality. Is she mad because of some inherited weakness from her mixed blood, as Rochester maintains, or is it his dehumanization of her that causes her madness? It seems to me that anyone in such circumstances would lose their sanity. As a last straw, Antoinette pleads for help from her stepbrother in Jamaica, but he refuses to interfere with her husband's rights over her. Antoinette begins stealing the key while her keeper sleeps and roaming the house at night. Eventually, as Jane Eyre fans will remember, she burns the place down.
This novel has strong elements of the Gothic -- Rhys definitely creates a dramatic, sinister atmosphere, and also portrays the lush beauty of the Jamaican countryside. The gap between Jamaica and cold, gray England is as wide as the vast Atlantic ocean that separates them. Even more deeply, not belonging is a horror. Racism is an exile. Powerlessness is shackles and chains. Dominion is an outrage. Perhaps, Rhys seems to suggest, a purifying fire is needed to move forward from what has gone before.
Excerpt:
But now I turned too. The house was burning, the yellow-red sky was like sunset and I knew that I would never see Coulibri again. Nothing would be left, the golden ferns and the silver ferns, the orchids, the ginger lilies and the roses, the rocking-chairs and the blue sofa, the jasmine and the honeysuckle . . . . When they had finished, there would be nothing left but blackened walls and the mounting stone. That was always left. That could not be stolen or burned.
Then, not so far off, I saw Tia and her mother and I ran to her, for she was all that was left of my life as it had been. We had eaten the same food, slept side by side, bathed in the same river. As I ran, I thought, I will live with Tia and I will be like her. Not to leave Coulibri. Not to go. Not. When I was close I saw the jagged stone in her hand but I did not see her throw it. I did not feel it either, only something wet, running down my face. I looked at her and I saw her face crumple up as she began to cry. We stared at each other, blood on my face, tears on hers. It was as if I saw myself. Like in a looking-glass.
Francie is 11 in 1912, when the story opens. She's a dreamy, observant, mostly solitary child who likes reading but also participates in the life of the neighborhood, which includes activities like scavenging for rags, paper, deposit bottles, and other junk that she can sell to the junk man to earn a few pennies of spending money. Katie, her mother, earns their lodging as the janitor for the building. Her father, Johnny, is an alcoholic who occasionally works as a singing waiter and on his good days, retains his Irish charm and zest for living. It's a hard life for all of them and yet they bear up under it with determination and grace. They are Dickensian without the sentimentality: an American analog rather than a copy.
Also reminiscent of Dickens, Francie's world is populated by a host of secondary characters and their lives and choices. Sometimes their purpose is comic relief. Sometimes their purpose is providing contrast with Francie's family. Sometimes their purpose is demonstrating that there are many ways of coping with the challenges of Francie's world. Whatever their social or economic status, these characters demonstrate how to rise -- or fail to rise -- to the occasion.
Katie, in particular, bears the responsibilities of the family, even more so after Johnny sickens and dies. Katie's insistence on principles and the better things for her family that come within her grasp set the stage for their progress. In her pragmatic way, she encourages Francie's desire for learning and talent for writing, and Francie progresses from a better school to a better job to pursuing her education: the family can't afford to send her to high school, but at age 17 Francie manages to pass the admissions exam and enroll in college. For Katie herself, her virtue leads to an advantageous marriage. Despite their poverty, each surviving member of the family has the grounding and the goodness to move ahead in the world.
The particularly positive approach to the immigrant "American Dream" gives this novel a retro, burnished quality; it treats even shockingly bad events with a discretion that reflects the original publication date of 1943. There are real dangers: The junk man pays extra to the girls who let him pinch their cheek. A music teacher asks Francie, but not her brother, to play in bare feet. A rapist lurks in the stairwell and grabs Francie before Katie intervenes (with a gun!). Francie's first love almost talks her into bed, then abandons her when she refuses; her heart is broken, but things could have been worse. All these events are viewed from a distance, and they do not define Francie; they are only part of her story. By the end of the novel, Francie is leaving Brooklyn behind, heading for college and the rest of her life. Growing up poor is also only part of her story.
Excerpt:
Some people called it the Tree of Heaven. No matter where its seed fell, it made a tree which struggled to reach the sky. It grew in boarded-up lots and out of neglected rubbish heaps and it was the only tree that grew out of cement. It grew lushly, but only in the tenements districts.
You took a walk on a Sunday afternoon and came to a nice neighborhood, very refined. You saw a small one of those trees through the iron gate leading to someone's yard and you knew that soon that section of Brooklyn would get to be a tenement district. The tree knew. It came there first. Afterwards, poor foreigners seeped in and the quiet old brownstone houses were hacked up into flats, feather beds were pushed out on the window sills to air and the Tree of Heaven flourished. That was the kind of tree it was. It liked poor people.
I love reading by color! It always leads to a variety of books that I probably wouldn't put together on my own.
Bev at My Reader's Block is a fine challenge hostess, providing enough structure for comfort without any fluff. It's the best of both worlds! Here's the sign-up link and you can join anytime during 2025.
Here's what 2025 looks like for me:
Blue: Wide Sargasso Sea - Jean Rhys (Radcliff's Top 100 Novels) (review)
Red: A Visit from the Goon Squad - Jennifer Egan (Pulitzer Prize) (review)
Yellow: The Beast and the Silent Blue - David O'Connor (Florida Book Award) (review)
Green: A Tree Grows in Brooklyn - Betty Smith (review)
Brown: My Name is Asher Lev - Chaim Potok (Pulitzer Prize) (review)
Black: His Lovely Wife - Elizabeth Dewberry (Florida Book Award) (review)
White: The Goldfinch - Donna Tartt (Pulitzer Prize) Substitute: The Collaborative Habit: Life Lessons for Working Together - Twyla Tharp (review)
Another color (teal): Half the Night is Gone - Amitabha Bagchi (DSC Prize for South Asian Literature) (review)
Implies Color: Demon Copperhead - Barbara Kingsolver (Pulitzer Prize) (review)